Skip to main content

In the land of grey and pink

I’m pretty happy with my current-model MacBook Pro 15”. I got the Santa Rosa based 2.2 GHz model via a very good education price deal (I work in a university), and it’s a great all round machine. Because I take lots of photographs, I have calibrated the MacBook Pro’s display as well as my 23” Cinema Display so that I get true colors when preparing photos for web or print. I used the Spyder2 Express from datacolor, which is a great little gadget. The idea is very simple: you use the supplied colorimeter to look at your monitor while an application displays swatches of known colors. The colorimeter reports the actual color appearing on the monitor, and the controlling application creates a table that records the difference between the RGB values in the swatches and the ones recorded by the colorimeter. This is known as a device color profile and the Mac can use its generic factory-shipped ones, or the more accurate ones you create for your own displays with the Spyder2 or similar devices, to calibrate your screens. Once you’ve done this calibration, you can be confident that the colors displayed on your monitor are as close as is technically possible to the colors the original creator of the image or graphic design intended.

So I ran the calibration process and used the new profile. It looked richer and crisper, and prints I made using Adorama and Apple’s printing service accessed via Aperture were true to the colors on my screen. Photographically, everything was perfect. However when using NetNewsWire, or looking at certain sites such as Facebook, I noticed that a range of greys would actually be displayed as pink (see first image). I re-ran the calibration process a few times but still got the same result. I wasn’t happy with this - it was annoying me, and I spend enough time looking at this screen for it to matter.

I searched a load of Mac sites using Google’s Mac-specific search, and didn’t find anything helpful. I then turned to Apple’s Discussions Forum for the MacBook Pro and found a couple of articles which narrowed the problem domain to people exactly in my situation: they’d got a new MacBook Pro with the LED backlight and calibrated it with a Spyder2 or similar device. It seemed that the problem was that the current Spyder2 software, version 2.3, was hard-coded to use a white point of D65 (equivalent to the color of light emitted by something heated to 6300° Kelvin, and for years regarded as the best technical definition of the actual color of daylight). From information in the discussions it was clear that version 2.2 of the software still had the white point hard-coded to whatever the display’s hardware regarded as white (Native white point) and this was preferable in this particular case to what Version 2.3 used to create the profile. Luckily Datacolor makes version 2.2 available on its web site, so I went there and fetched the older version. I chose to put the old version of the software in a folder called Applications in my home directory, instead of the main Applications directory.[1]

I ran the old version of the app, and let it do its thing. When I looked at the display as managed by the new profile, it looked fine - the pinks had gone (see figure 2). Then I turned the Cinema Display back on, which had been off because, as my friend David says of a similar screen, you could light a cigarette using its output and a cheap lens at 50 feet. In fact it’s so bright that as the sole light source in our living room it will let you expose a decent shot of the room at f/22, ISO 400, in only two seconds. Spillage from this monster would have biased the calibration process. Cross checking with the Cinema - which was my reference screen - showed that while the greys were now pleasingly neutral, the whites on the MacBook Pro were now a faint but nauseous green. I tried to stick with this state of affairs for a day or so, but as I switched my attention between the Cinema and the MacBook Pro displays, it was even more jarring than the pinkish greys, and I changed the profile back to the original one.

I was stymied. The old version rendered the greys correctly, but produced unacceptable whites. The new version had crisp clean whites but pinkish greys. The Apple standard profile was too pale and too blue. Running manual calibration on the Apple profile but setting the gamma to 2.2 instead of the historic default of 1.8 helped with the paleness but didn’t help with the pinks. The male line of my family is genetically blessed in taking lush, healthy heads of hair to the grave, but I was at risk of being the first of our line to die bald as a result of my frustration. The only solution seemed to be to get hold of either upgraded software for the Spyder2 or get a better system such as the Eye One Display 2.

The answer came, as it often does, serendipitously. I was reading and came across Dan Frakes’s review of various brightness controller apps for recent Mac models. I had not really felt the need for extra control of brightness of the displays I use - I thought I was managing quite well with the native keyboard-based controls for the MacBook Pro and the Cinema Display’s Star Trek-like touch controls on its right-hand side. Nevertheless something impelled me to try Shades. I installed it, and then pulled its onscreen brightness slider down a little to dim the display slightly. The effect on colors was dramatic - the pinkish greys became the most neutral of shades possible. I nudged the brightness back up and the pink flush returned. I used the hardware control to dim the display and instead of the neutral greys I expected, I saw darker pinkish greys. Clearly Shades is doing something different to what the hardware backlight control is doing. I don’t yet have an explanation but I’m heartily glad that I have a solution.

The lesson here is: never stop reading, never stop experimenting. You can even make an analogy with biodiversity: we never know what we might need until we need it, and at present we’re eliminating our options as to sources of rare and interesting molecules every time we let a Western feedstuffs company wipe out a tract of forest or jungle. We’ll pay for that, and maybe sooner than we think. In the Mac world, it’s the small developers like Charcoal Design who are accidentally solving problems they probably don’t even know exist. It’s in every Mac user’s interest to cherish and support them.

  1. One great thing about Macs is that applications are just files (they’re actually folders (directories) pretending to be files, but usually that doesn’t matter) and you can put them anywhere and call them anything you like. This is another great feature of Mac OS X - you can put any app in this folder and it works just as if it were living in the main Applications folder, but it can’t affect any other user on your computer. It’s very useful for trying out new versions of programs (or in my case, older ones).


mrkgoo said…
I have the same issue with the Spyder2 and a new MacBook Pro. Photos look much better, but greys have a slight pink cast, and with my subjective eyes, it can be better or worse on any given day.
Shades for me does not provide a solution. It controls brightness, I believe, by intercepting the colour profile before it gets displayed (you can see this when you try to change the colour profile AFTER activating Shades. Your new profile will briefly appear before Shades jumps in and reapplies the colour profile you had when you activated it).
The brightness control on the computer is just a hardware backlight control. I'm still not sure what the best solution is. I think the LED screens are a bit green, and this combined with the fact that the Spyder calibrates colour temperature by three shades (black, grey, white) may be the issue.
Simon said…
Yes, I agree, Shades isn't the answer. I think it puts a huge translucent window over the entire desktop at the top of the Z-order because Skitch reports all screen grabs on any window as being grabs of "Shades". I've also noticed the interception of profile malarkey.

My solution, following a suggestion from James Duncan Davidson, was to use ColorEyes Pro which works with the Spyder hardware but writes substantially better profiles. The greys still have a slight pink cast but it's nowhere near as bad as the Spyder profiles. I think this is just a major drawback of the MacBooks Pro.
mrkgoo said…
Yes, I did take a look into that, but I didn't like the software - it was much too technical with little help. And it left things all over my clean OS X! (Well, at least some stuff in startup). Most importantly, it costs another US$175. I already think I paid too much for the Spyder2suite (In excess of US$199 - stuff like this is hard to come by and expensive where I live), so I wasn't about to fork out for more just to make this product 'work'.

Interestingly, I've found a slight workaround -it's dark here, so my eyes are more sensitive to this stuff right now and we'll have to wait until I can test my new profile out in other conditions, but:

I used my Spyder2 sideways on my MBP screen. Yes, sideways, with the cord coming in from the left (actually, I lay my screen flat and rested the Spyder2 on top).

I've retested this and it seems like it reproducibly produces greys that are slightly greener.

What was the rationale for my insanity? Well, I noticed that the issue wasn't so much poor calibration so much as the screens themselves are very sensitive to viewing angle, particularly when tilting it back and forth vertically. You can see this by changing your own viewing angle or tilting the screen - also the light reflected onto the keyboard from a white screen is very red after calibration, but green before! I also noticed that the honeycomb pattern on the bottom filter is hexagonal so differs in orientation depending on which way around it is.

My wild theory was that either the sensor was slightly tilted, or light was reflecting off the honeycomb baffles at strange angles to ever so slightly mess with the profiling.

You know, I might just be out of my mind here, obsessing over this stuff, but my latest profile retains the 'pink' whites, but has ever so slightly 'green' greys.

To check if I wasn't going crazy, I would love to know if the same thing happens with others.

Popular posts from this blog

Getting It Done?

As someone who has worked at many jobs in which it is part of the job description to be interrupted incessantly, whilst at the same time having, as part of the same job, work that needs careful planning, reflection and sustained concentration to execute correctly, I've had many problems with the usual time-management approaches. Most of them seem to have been conceived in some middle-management Utopia back in the '50s, a place where everyone has an office with a door, the closure of which was sacrosanct; a time before email, pagers, cellphones and Blackberries; a society where "getting up in someone's face" was a social crime rather than a standard business strategy.

That said, you can't let your life be run by random events and dropping everything to work on whatever the customer who shouts the loudest wants. You need some sort of system, and I've found the system popularized by David Allen, which he calls by the arcane, obscure name of Getting Things Don…

Folk Ergonomics: or, it all Fitts

When I was a poor civil servant (plus ça change) and part-time graduate student I longed to own a Mac. I’d read everything available about them, and nothing I read did anything to dissuade me. What I wanted, as well as the crisp, typographic display and the integration between the applications, was the windowing system. I already knew, somehow, that a Proper Computer™ would be able to show more than one program on the screen at once and let you move between them. Lacking the funds to buy the current model Apple was offering, a Mac SE, I made do with an Atari ST 520 STFM. This was a strange machine with a dual personality:a games machine with aspirations to being a workstation, and which used the non-broken version of Digital Research’s GEM windowing environment. This system had been shamelessly copied from the Mac interface, so much so that Apple sued Digital Research and got an injunction that prevented later versions of GEM (used on DOS machines, notably those from Amstrad) from us…